carolina panthers vs tampa bay buccaneers match player stats

Carolina Panthers vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers Match Player Stats: A Breakdown of Key Performances and Game Highlights

The Carolina Panthers and Tampa Bay Buccaneers faced off in a Week 17 matchup that saw the Buccaneers dominate across almost every statistical category, ending the game with a commanding 48-14 victory. The Panthers, with a 4-12 record and 1-6 on the road, came into the game with hopes of finishing the season strong, but they were outmatched by the Buccaneers’ 9-7 record, including a 4-4 mark at home. While the Panthers showed some flashes of promise, the Buccaneers’ overall efficiency and execution in all phases of the game were too much to overcome.

Team Overview

Carolina Panthers (4-12, 1-6 Away)
Tampa Bay Buccaneers (9-7, 4-4 Home)

Final Score:

  • Carolina Panthers: 14
  • Tampa Bay Buccaneers: 48

Team Stats Breakdown

Offensive Performance

The Panthers’ offense struggled to gain momentum throughout the game. With only 204 total yards, they were consistently outpaced by the Buccaneers, who accumulated 551 total yards. Carolina’s offense managed just 13 first downs, while Tampa Bay registered a dominant 33 first downs.

Passing Game:


The Panthers’ passing attack was limited to 165 yards, averaging 5.0 yards per attempt. Quarterback play was inconsistent, with 15 completions on 28 attempts, but they did not throw any interceptions. The Buccaneers, on the other hand, put together a near-perfect passing performance with 349 yards. Quarterback Tom Brady was sharp, completing 27 of 32 attempts for an impressive 10.3 yards per pass. Both teams avoided interceptions, but Brady’s efficiency allowed the Buccaneers to sustain drives and exploit the Panthers’ defense.

Rushing Game:


The Panthers’ rushing attack was nearly nonexistent, gaining just 39 yards on 13 attempts for an average of 3.0 yards per carry. Running back struggles were apparent, and they were unable to establish any sort of rhythm on the ground. By contrast, the Buccaneers dominated in the running game, finishing with 202 yards on 40 attempts. Tampa Bay averaged 5.1 yards per carry, with several big runs that extended drives and wore down the Panthers’ defense.

Defensive Performance

Tampa Bay Defense:


The Buccaneers’ defense had a strong outing, particularly in the trenches. They sacked the Panthers’ quarterbacks five times for a loss of 38 yards. The defensive line consistently pressured Carolina’s passers, forcing them into uncomfortable situations. Tampa Bay’s defense also held Carolina to only two rushing first downs, limiting the Panthers’ ability to control the ball. Despite not forcing a turnover, Tampa Bay’s ability to control the line of scrimmage and limit big plays was critical in their dominant performance.

Carolina Defense:


The Panthers’ defense was overpowered by the Buccaneers. They allowed 551 total yards, including 349 passing yards. Carolina struggled to generate pressure on Brady, recording just two sacks for a loss of 10 yards. Additionally, the Panthers allowed five red-zone touchdowns on eight attempts, which further highlights the breakdowns in coverage and defensive execution. The lack of consistent pass rush and inability to cover in the secondary gave the Buccaneers the opportunity to score at will.

Key Players and Individual Stats

Carolina Panthers

  • Sam Darnold (QB): Darnold struggled throughout the game, completing just 15 of 28 passes for 165 yards. His 5.0 yards per attempt reflected the Panthers’ inability to push the ball down the field. Darnold was under pressure much of the game, contributing to his subpar performance. He did not throw an interception but also did not provide any significant plays to spark the offense.
  • Chuba Hubbard (RB): Hubbard had 13 carries for 39 yards, averaging 3.0 yards per carry. With the running game limited, Hubbard was unable to break free for any notable runs, and the Panthers were forced to rely on Darnold’s passing.
  • DJ Moore (WR): Moore finished with 5 receptions for 76 yards, the most productive offensive player for the Panthers. While he had a few key catches, the Panthers’ passing game as a whole struggled to find a rhythm.
  • Brian Burns (DE): Burns was one of the few bright spots on defense for Carolina. He had one sack, showing his ability to pressure the quarterback, but it wasn’t enough to disrupt Brady’s offensive flow.

Tampa Bay Buccaneers

  • Tom Brady (QB): Brady was nearly flawless in the passing game, completing 27 of 32 passes for 349 yards and 4 touchdowns. His 10.3 yards per attempt demonstrated his ability to move the ball down the field efficiently. Brady’s decision-making and accuracy allowed the Buccaneers’ offense to control the tempo of the game.
  • Rachaad White (RB): White was effective on the ground, rushing for 84 yards on 15 attempts, averaging 5.6 yards per carry. His ability to gain yards on early downs helped set up the passing game, and his physical running style contributed to the Buccaneers’ offensive dominance.
  • Mike Evans (WR): Evans had a big game, hauling in 5 catches for 104 yards and 2 touchdowns. His size and athleticism were key factors in his ability to get open and make big plays, particularly in the red zone. Evans’ performance helped solidify the Buccaneers’ commanding lead.
  • Devin White (LB): White was everywhere on defense, contributing to the Buccaneers’ ability to control the middle of the field. Although he did not register a sack, White’s presence was felt throughout the game as he disrupted plays and made crucial tackles in the running game.

Statistical Highlights

  • Time of Possession: One of the most glaring differences in the game was time of possession. The Buccaneers held the ball for 41 minutes and 11 seconds, while the Panthers only had possession for 18 minutes and 49 seconds. This disparity reflected the Buccaneers’ efficiency on offense and their ability to convert third downs. The Panthers struggled to stay on the field and could not sustain drives.
  • Third Down Efficiency: The Panthers were just 2-of-9 on third down, an abysmal 22%. Meanwhile, the Buccaneers were an impressive 10-of-14 (71%) on third downs. Tampa Bay’s ability to extend drives allowed their offense to stay on the field and wear down the Panthers’ defense.
  • Red Zone Efficiency: The Panthers converted only 1 of their 1 red-zone opportunity, while the Buccaneers were 5-of-8. Tampa Bay’s ability to score touchdowns in the red zone helped them build a commanding lead and finish the game without much resistance from the Panthers.

Key Takeaways

  1. Dominance in the Trenches: The Buccaneers’ offensive line controlled the line of scrimmage, allowing Brady to operate efficiently and opening up running lanes for White. On the other side, the Panthers’ offensive line struggled to protect Darnold, leading to multiple sacks and limited running lanes.
  2. Brady’s Mastery: Tom Brady showed once again why he is considered one of the greatest quarterbacks of all time. His precision passing and ability to read the defense were on full display, as he guided the Buccaneers to a commanding victory.
  3. Lack of Offensive Balance for Carolina: The Panthers were unable to establish any offensive balance, particularly in the running game. Hubbard’s 3.0 yards per carry average highlights their struggles on the ground, which in turn limited their passing attack.
  4. Tampa Bay’s Red Zone Efficiency: The Buccaneers were incredibly efficient inside the red zone, converting 5 of their 8 opportunities into touchdowns. This efficiency was a key factor in their ability to pull away from the Panthers in the second half.
  5. Defensive Struggles for Carolina: The Panthers allowed 48 points, a reflection of their inability to stop Tampa Bay’s offense in all phases. The lack of a consistent pass rush and ineffective coverage in the secondary were major issues for Carolina.

Conclusion

The Carolina Panthers were thoroughly outplayed in almost every phase of the game against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Despite a few individual bright spots, the Panthers’ offense and defense were unable to compete with the efficiency and execution of the Buccaneers. Tampa Bay’s dominant performance was highlighted by Tom Brady’s efficient passing, a strong running game, and defensive control. The game underscored the growing gap between the two teams, with the Buccaneers heading into the postseason with momentum, while the Panthers continue to look for answers in their rebuilding process.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top